(Funk, Soul) [LP][16/44.1] The Ebony Jam Band - The Ebony Jam Band - 1981, FLAC (tracks), lossless

Страницы:  1
Ответить
 

goodgroove

Стаж: 16 лет 1 месяц

Сообщений: 116

goodgroove · 20-Авг-09 14:17 (16 лет 1 месяц назад, ред. 28-Сен-09 20:47)

The Ebony Jam Band - The Ebony Jam Band
Жанр: Disco, Funk
Год выпуска диска: 1981
Производитель диска: Starbound (STB-1001)
Аудио кодек: FLAC
Тип рипа: tracks
Битрейт аудио: lossless
Трэклист:
01 - Give Dance A Chance (3:28)
02 - Sexy Lady (3:17)
03 - Jam With The Band (3:24)
04 - I See A Woman (3:24)
05 - Cathalene's Love (5:49)
06 - Make-Up Lover (4:21)
07 - Will You Stay With Me (3:02)
08 - Opposite (2:58)
09 - I Wanna Be Your Man (3:26)
10 - Mr. T's Space (5:04)
Дополнительная информация
Класс состояния винила: NM
Устройство воспроизведения: Technics SL-1210-MK2 turntable + Shure M97XE cartridge & stylus
Предварительный усилитель: TCC TC-750 Phono Preamp
АЦП: Creative USB Sound Blaster Audigy 2 NX Sound Card
Программа-оцифровщик: Cool Edit 2000
Обработка: 1. Ручное удаление крупных щелчков (Cool Edit 2000); 2. Автоматическое удаление щелчков (Wave Lab 4.0 Wave X-Click); 3. Разрезка на треки, плавный вход-выход (Ручное - Cool Edit 2000); 4. Сжатие (Flac fronted v. 1.7.0.1).
Формат записи (Bit/kHz): 16/44,1
Формат раздачи (Bit/kHz): 16/44,1
Analysis
скрытый текст
===> MY VINYL RIP PROCEDURES <===
To clean the vinyls I use the Knosti Disco-Antistat record cleaning system.
To remove the surface dust I use the Nagaoka Rolling Cleaner.
The vinyls are ripped through this equipment:
- Shure M97XE cartridge & stylus
- Technics SL-1210-MK2 turntable
- TCC TC-750 Phono Preamp
- Creative USB Sound Blaster Audigy 2 NX Sound Card
The files were ripped using GoldWave or CoolEdit 2000 and saved as WAV files.
The sample rate of the wav file is 44.1 kH and the resolution is 16 bit.
REMASTERING: Only if it's necessary, removing click & pops with Cool Edit 2000 or Wave Lab 4.0.
COMPRESSION: FLAC Fronted or Monkey's Audio.
Each file is separate. As they're vinyl rips I didn't use EAC and, therefore, there's no log file.
===> WHY ONLY A 16bit AND NOT A 24bit RECORDING? <===
I am not an audiophile. I have tried to understand which it was the better resolution to rip my vinyls.
I have found this wonderful guide: Transferring LPs to CDR: Some Advice
This is the point about the question "Is 16 bit Recording Enough?"
скрытый текст
Download
Rutracker.org не распространяет и не хранит электронные версии произведений, а лишь предоставляет доступ к создаваемому пользователями каталогу ссылок на торрент-файлы, которые содержат только списки хеш-сумм
Как скачивать? (для скачивания .torrent файлов необходима регистрация)
[Профиль]  [ЛС] 

marmalin

Стаж: 16 лет 8 месяцев

Сообщений: 2908

marmalin · 20-Авг-09 14:35 (спустя 17 мин., ред. 20-Авг-09 14:35)

Цитата:
2. Автоматическое удаление щелчков (Wave Lab 4.0 Wave X-Click); 3. Разрезка на треки, плавный вход-выход (Ручное - Cool Edit 2000)
Это ты зря так, кому надо, тот сам может данные телодвижения произвести. Да и 44/16 - как-то не серьезно...а жаль
Хотя, чего хотеть от Audigy.
Или это не твое производство?
[Профиль]  [ЛС] 

goodgroove

Стаж: 16 лет 1 месяц

Сообщений: 116

goodgroove · 20-Авг-09 15:30 (спустя 55 мин.)

marmalin писал(а):
Цитата:
2. Автоматическое удаление щелчков (Wave Lab 4.0 Wave X-Click); 3. Разрезка на треки, плавный вход-выход (Ручное - Cool Edit 2000)
Это ты зря так, кому надо, тот сам может данные телодвижения произвести. Да и 44/16 - как-то не серьезно...а жаль
Хотя, чего хотеть от Audigy.
Или это не твое производство?
Sorry but I do not understand your language. I use a web translator in order to understand what you write.
I have many vinyls (and these are my productions), but if you do not think them valid, I will post only CDs.
=========
Огорченно а он не поймите ваш язык. Я использую переводчика паутины для того чтобы понять чего вы пишете.
Я имею много винилов (и эти мои продукции), но если вы не думаете они действительные, то я вывешу только CDs.
[Профиль]  [ЛС] 

marmalin

Стаж: 16 лет 8 месяцев

Сообщений: 2908

marmalin · 20-Авг-09 22:43 (спустя 7 часов, ред. 20-Авг-09 22:43)

Ok, I just wanna say - you'd better present your rip without such manipulation with raw sound, like fade in/out, noise reducing or automatic declicking (manual is acceptable). The other moment I should emphasize - 16/44,1 is not popular format at local community and it's not a matter of validity, just tradition and preference Take a glance at branch "собственные оцифровки"...
Well, the stuff of Is 16 bit Recording Enough? is very argueable. Author does look tendentiously at the art of sound extraction from LP. I can give you a lot of examples of pure, clear and "alive" 24/96&192 sound (IMHO this is one of the best), where you can realize an inadequacy of 16/44,1. Listen and make your decision.
Disclaimer: All above-stated material is strictly IMHO, your conclusion is made on your own...
P.S. Surely, Audigy is not the best choice for HI-FI ripping.
[Профиль]  [ЛС] 

goodgroove

Стаж: 16 лет 1 месяц

Сообщений: 116

goodgroove · 21-Авг-09 11:41 (спустя 12 часов)

As I have wrote, I am not an audiophile and my knowledge about Hi-Fi is very poor
I am only a collector of vinyls (disco & funk of seventies and early eighties).
marmalin писал(а):
Ok, I just wanna say - you'd better present your rip without such manipulation with raw sound, like fade in/out, noise reducing or automatic declicking (manual is acceptable).
I never apply noise reduction. About removing click and pops, this depend on the condition of the vinyl. A NM do not need this procedure. In a VG+, generally only manual declick. In the others (poor) condition, I think that automatic declick must be done.
marmalin писал(а):
The other moment I should emphasize - 16/44,1 is not popular format at local community and it's not a matter of validity, just tradition and preference Take a glance at branch "собственные оцифровки"...
Well, the stuff of Is 16 bit Recording Enough? is very argueable. Author does look tendentiously at the art of sound extraction from LP. I can give you a lot of examples of pure, clear and "alive" 24/96&192 sound (IMHO this is one of the best), where you can realize an inadequacy of 16/44,1. Listen and make your decision.
Thanks for your suggestions, but... how do you listen 24/96&192 sound? If you burn a CDR... the standard is 16/44,1. You could burn a DVD-audio but the majority of the DVD-players converts the output signal into 16/44,1 (mine, makes this).
marmalin писал(а):
Disclaimer: All above-stated material is strictly IMHO, your conclusion is made on your own...
P.S. Surely, Audigy is not the best choice for HI-FI ripping.
Which is the best choice? Considered that I have a laptop and I need an USB device. I have much to learn and your advices are appreciate.
[Профиль]  [ЛС] 

marmalin

Стаж: 16 лет 8 месяцев

Сообщений: 2908

marmalin · 21-Авг-09 14:56 (спустя 3 часа)

Цитата:
Thanks for your suggestions, but... how do you listen 24/96&192 sound? If you burn a CDR... the standard is 16/44,1. You could burn a DVD-audio but the majority of the DVD-players converts the output signal into 16/44,1 (mine, makes this).
Actually, my DVD-player doesn't support DVD-Audio format , so I listen 24/96&192 on my PC with Audio-Technica cans
But all DVD-player must support leastwise 16/48, some models up to 24/96 (DVD-Video mode), so I suppose you should go and examine your player's setup for better performance
Цитата:
Which is the best choice? Considered that I have a laptop and I need an USB device. I have much to learn and your advices are appreciate.
"The best chois" have only ads-makers, all others are looking for it :mrgreen:. In your case I could advice you to look through the local HiRes sound uploaders for analysis - what devices they use for their needs. For example MasterRuRu has the same turntable, his ADC is Tascam HD-P2 and results of ripping are very good.
[Профиль]  [ЛС] 
 
Ответить
Loading...
Error